Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>> Far as I know there is no written rules about such things. I assumed FL attractions could be of any sort, from dark rides, to boat rides, to teacups, to mine trains. Feel free to enlighten me.,<<< Totally agreed. I mean, look at DL and DLP... ...Anything for bulk!
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>Replace "E-ticket" with "ride of the highest caliber."<< THIS. Bulk. Substance.
Originally Posted By Lee hisownself >>Look at IASW... Huge E Ticket...<< Ugh... Please...nothing like IASW again. Ever. I accepted long ago that they had no plans for a big E back there. Not since Villian Mtn. never made it off the drawing boards. That's why I'm just rooting for the best D possible, which I firmly believe the 7DMR will be. >>BUT THERE SHOULD BE SOMETHING BACK THERE THAT DOES TELL A STORY<< Well...Mermaid tells a story. Of course (yawn) it's the same old Mermaid story we all know already. (I need to write a long rant about how much I hate when the same old story from an animated feature is regurgitated in a ride. I have really grown to loathe that. I think Uni is doing it right...take an existing story/character and use it as a jumping off point for an attraction.)
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>Ugh... Please...nothing like IASW again. Ever. I accepted long ago that they had no plans for a big E back there. Not since Villian Mtn. never made it off the drawing boards. That's why I'm just rooting for the best D possible, which I firmly believe the 7DMR will be.<<< Don't get the IASW hate... classic Disney, classic World's Fair, classic Mary Blair art. It's a staple. Granted, content doesn't have to to be one big E tic, it could be a lot of little things. Lots of small dark rides. But two? Eh. >>Well...Mermaid tells a story. Of course (yawn) it's the same old Mermaid story we all know already. (I need to write a long rant about how much I hate when the same old story from an animated feature is regurgitated in a ride. I have really grown to loathe that. I think Uni is doing it right...take an existing story/character and use it as a jumping off point for an attraction.<<< Creatively, I totally agree. In what FL is, and needs? It's typical. Just used to it...
Originally Posted By HMButler79 ."" It is still on paper, it hasn't happened yet. It does not exist and yet an opinion is offered based on something that doesn't exist."" So the concept art on the construction wall, the concept art at D23, the ride vehicle mock up and the CGI ride through mock and the model of NewFL do NOT exist, ? CORRECT? The Disney TeaParty is out in force! "lalalal cant hear you lalala"
Originally Posted By HMButler79 I wonder how many of these passive agressive pixie addicts had a "wait n see" approach before DCA 1.0 or Stitch happened. Yeaaaaaaaaaa.........
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo I'll say it. To me It's a Small World, depite being the worst version at the MK (like most MK versions), is one of the very best attractions and has far more significance than many of the other e tickets. There is far more meaning in it than any of the Disney mountains.
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo >>>I wonder how many of these passive agressive pixie addicts had a "wait n see" approach before DCA 1.0 or Stitch happened. Yeaaaaaaaaaa.........<<< We have them in Europe too. I knew what we were getting with Toy Story Playland and they all said "wait and see", now sadly, some have come to realise what a waste of time and money it is. The days of Disney and quality has entered the history books. That said, this makeover is 30+ years well overdue. I hate the MK Fantasyland as a concrete wasteland. I am with Dennis here, this will add a huge amount, even if you do not use any of the new attractions. TSPL however is still a waste.
Originally Posted By sjhym333 It's a shame. We just came into some surprise money and decided to give a gift to our adult children. We offered Disney AP's. They opted for Universal instead. They are big Disney fans but see Universal as a better option this year.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>I'll say it. To me It's a Small World, depite being the worst version at the MK (like most MK versions), is one of the very best attractions and has far more significance than many of the other e tickets. There is far more meaning in it than any of the Disney mountains.<<< Hey, we still don't have the characters smashed in there. Thank goodness. I agree about it's significance and meaning, but would do so without putting down the mountains. Same echelon of attraction. It's CLASSIC.
Originally Posted By HMButler79 ""To me It's a Small World, depite being the worst version at the MK (like most MK versions)"" I actually love MKs more because it and Tokyo's are the only ones that Rolly Crump was show producer for. His style is far more evident in those two Small Worlds.
Originally Posted By Goofyernmost >>>So the concept art on the construction wall, the concept art at D23, the ride vehicle mock up and the CGI ride through mock and the model of NewFL do NOT exist, ? CORRECT? The Disney TeaParty is out in force! "lalalal cant hear you lalala"<<< Never said that. The concept, the mock up and the model do exist. The ride doesn't. It will likely go through many changes between now and the time it becomes a reality. In the meantime, you feel that you can look at a piece of artwork and based on that and your own preferences and determine it's a loser? It was mentioned somewhere something to the effect...should we wait until it's done before we comment, when it's too late to correct it? Well, Duh! Unless you have some ability to affect that type of change then you might just as well. Do you really think that your disapproval means a tinkers damn to Disney's shakers and movers? I know it is tough to see when each side thinks they are right about something, but the not listening "lalala" childishness applies to more than one stand here.
Originally Posted By leobloom I really like the aesthetics of Small World. Very stylized, but it gives the ride a distinct identity. And one thing I definitely prefer with MK's version is the flooded-room effect. DL's has that canal snaking through all the rooms, but MK's really gives the feeling of being on a larger body of water.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> Do you really think that your disapproval means a tinkers damn to Disney's shakers and movers? I know it is tough to see when each side thinks they are right about something, but the not listening "lalala" childishness applies to more than one stand here. << Universal is listening.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<They are big Disney fans but see Universal as a better option this year.>> That's because it is. Best thing about Universal Aps is their renewal rate, too. It's half the price as the first purchase. As for IASW, I wouldn't be upset if it's the next attraction that caught fire.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> As for IASW, I wouldn't be upset if it's the next attraction that caught fire. << I'm cool with that if it's replaced with Indiana Jones.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<I'm cool with that if it's replaced with Indiana Jones.>> That would be an odd placement haha.
Originally Posted By leobloom With Lucas, anything's possible. Indiana Jones and the Magical Necklace of Pixie Hollow. See?