Originally Posted By Tony C <<The straw was the heading of the HM queue thread--it didn't even wait for 5 posts.>> Reading some of the posts of the author of that queue I couldn't help but think if he's disgusted by HM queue the "real world" will be quite a shock.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> absolutely agree Leo-- only ride that made me ill every single time I tried it...I can take most rides but that one was awful. I finally stopped not to long before they shuttered it. << Agreed. It made me nauseous like no other ride ever has. On the other hand, Cranium Command was one of the most charming attractions at Epcot. And as someone else mentioned in one of the dozen threads that are currently treading water while we wait for something new at WDW, the interior design of Wonders of Life was less than inspired. The place looked like a mid-80s shopping mall.
Originally Posted By leobloom Late submission for another nauseating simulator: Wild Arctic at SeaWorld. Went this weekend with my wife and not only is it a blatant Star Tours ripoff, but I thought it was as jerky and rough as Body Wars.
Originally Posted By Manfried Y'all realize that opening day for EPCOT Center was practically all films right?
Originally Posted By Manfried All y'all complaining about Star Tours do realize it was the first major use of simulators and that unfortunately everyone else tried to copy it, but forgot story right?
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper ^^^I love Star Tours. But it's about 7 years overdue for this upgrade. Not denying it was revolutionary or great for it's time.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper ^^^I love Star Tours. But it's about 7 years overdue for this upgrade. Not denying it was revolutionary or great for it's time.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> Y'all realize that opening day for EPCOT Center was practically all films right? << Isn't that an overstatement? SSE, Imag, Listen to the Land, Kitchen Kabaret, Energy, El Rio del Mexico, World of Motion. None of those were exclusively screen-based attractions, and only Energy was predominantly one.
Originally Posted By GOB The Disney we (used to) know had usually been at the forefront of whatever technology that was state-of-the-art, whether it be audio-animatronics or theater. If Disney is to use screens, they must go above and beyond whatever the other parks are doing with them. But there's an aspect of experience that's lost when you replace audio-animatronic vignettes with screens. It's not as magical.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>Y'all realize that opening day for EPCOT Center was practically all films right?<<< Hardly... SSE, LwtL, Motion... World Showcase, maybe, but not FW.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer And the issue isn't the screen/movie attractions, that are actual theaters, it's the issue of screens being in attractions where there should be AAs.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer What GOB said. Shoulda seen the rest of the page before I posted.
Originally Posted By wahooskipper I thought highly of both of those as well Tony. I always thought Horizons was underrated. But, I loved that there was rarely a long line in its later years. World of Motion was great too but I do like Test Track.
Originally Posted By Christi22222 The key with so many of the debates we have here at LP is degrees and moderations. Screens can be great and are a valuable tool in the theme park tool box. I think most of us would agree with that. The differing opinions come when some of us feel that a fairly cheap and easy tool (screen) is being used to the exclusion of other more interesting and ground breaking (i.e. expensive) tools.
