Originally Posted By DAR This seems like a smart decision on Obama's part. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080610/ap_on_el_pr/obama_veepstakes" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...epstakes</a>
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <The ridiculous notion that the GOP is some thrift-minded bunch is a dog that won't hunt anymore, Doug.> They are better than the Democrats. <I'd rather it be spent on things that actually help people to have better conditions, rather than pre-emptive wars.> Me too. And if I had any faith that the Democrats could do it, I'd vote for them. But I haven't seen one iota of evidence that it is true.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh Despite woody's occasionally mangled syntax, he's still generally more correct than Dabob.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <Despite woody's occasionally mangled syntax, he's still generally more correct than Dabob.> No, he isn't.
Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder "Despite woody's occasionally mangled syntax, he's still generally more correct than Dabob." You might agree with him more, but that doesn't make him correct. Or understandable.
Originally Posted By DAR Well talk radio just got some new material: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080611/ap_on_el_pr/obama_veepstakes" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...epstakes</a>
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <You might agree with him more, but that doesn't make him correct.> Yes, it does.
Originally Posted By ecdc >>Yes, it does.<< If this is a joke, it's actually pretty funny. If it's not, it's actually pretty sad.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 In several years of reading you, I (and most people here) know all about it.