Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan Someone said [CENSORED] and then the other person was all "[CENSORED]"! But then when [CENSORED] said "[CENSORED]", all bets were off. [CENSORED] responded with "Well, at least I don't [CENSORED] with my [CENSORED]" which, in my opinion, was just too much. Of course, this lead to several posts calling each other things like [CENSORED], [CENSORED] and that old chestnut, [CENSORED]. That should get you up to speed, BlueDevil.
Originally Posted By DAR I don't feel like going through all these posts because I have a feeling what was discussed. But I do have a question. So it's being proven that if some are born as a homosexual. But what happens in the case of twins or triplets? What are the chances that a Goslin or Octo-kid could be gay but the rest of the siblings aren't?
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan >>What are the chances that a Goslin or Octo-kid could be gay but the rest of the siblings aren't?<< After seeing how their media-hungry parents behave, I think there's about a 16 in 16 chance they'll just choose total celibacy. ; )
Originally Posted By imadisneygal The incidence of the second identical twin of a gay male being homosexual is about 50%, whereas the fraternal twin of a gay male has about a 20% incidence of being gay. And siblings who are not twins at all have about a 10% incidence of being gay. There does appear to be at least a component of genetics, and a pretty strong one.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 Just to answer DAR's question, if one twin is gay, the other is more likely to be so also (even twins raised apart), but only more likely than the general population. The second twin is still most likely straight. I don't remember the exact numbers. Identical twins are more likely still to both be gay ( or both straight). But even that is not a done deal. Even identical twins don't have identical DNA. They have different fingerprints, for instance, and there's also the concept of certain genetic traits "kicking in" to different degrees. For instance, identical twin brothers may both have the gene for male pattern baldness, but it kicks in more in one and so he loses more hair.
Originally Posted By imadisneygal It's definitely important to remember that genes and the expression of genes aren't always 100% correlated.
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By Mr X Another one for the red pen brigade. (for everyone who was asking, it was entirely posts like above (or worse) from the troll, that got erased)
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
