Originally Posted By Dabob2 >>Not hardly. But I do reserve my best for the grown-ups.<< <No, you're as good as the last post. You're an embarrassment.> Gee, more irony. I've been having a discussion with staunch conservative RC Collins on another thread. We agree about almost nothing, and have been disagreeing consistently. But we've kept it literate, respectful, calm, intelligent, and on-point as opposed to going off on strange tangents. Concepts which continue to elude you without your even realizing it.
Originally Posted By woody You're still an embarrassment. Off-topic? Look in the mirror. btw, I am waiting for an reply to Kar2oonman. The thread that you ignored in favor of your "irony", which is strangely not the topic.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <You're still an embarrassment. Off-topic?> I didn't say that part was off-topic, I said it was ironic coming from someone who embarrasses himself with nearly every post. Kar2oonman may or may not respond - he may have just gotten fed up with your childishness. Seriously, look at someone like RC or vbdad55 if you want to see conservatives who make their points intelligently and civilly. Sadly, in the level of your arguments and rhetoric, you're more like Beau without the plagarism.
Originally Posted By woody >>Kar2oonman may or may not respond - he may have just gotten fed up with your childishness.<< He shows that he is the child. He was unable to come up with an adult response. He doesn't argue the point and he ignores evidence. I use all rhetorical devices to my advantage. You should be aware of it. I don't place restrictions on you. You should be aware that I will respond in whatever tone in kind.
Originally Posted By woody >>I didn't say that part was off-topic, I said it was ironic coming from someone who embarrasses himself with nearly every post.<< I said it was off-topic. You call me childish, yet you're completely off-topic with your "irony" type of ad hominem attacks. The irony is you're the one embarrassing yourself and you don't notice.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <I use all rhetorical devices to my advantage. You should be aware of it.> I'm aware than in a battle of wits, you typically show up unarmed. <The irony is you're the one embarrassing yourself and you don't notice.> Woody, you can't even come up with an original comeback, instead just parroting what I said to you. It's Jr. High-level stuff and its' sad, really.
Originally Posted By ecdc Woody, grow up or go back to playing with the children somewhere else. You have terrible logic and reasoning skills and as many others have pointed out, you're incapable of civility. The fact that you can't keep up with the discussion isn't 2oony of Dabob's fault. You showed up here all pissed off and looking for a fight. If that's your level of maturity, look elsewhere. If you're just having a lousy couple of weeks, fair enough. We all have our bad moments. But it's time to give it a rest and show the people on these boards the respect they deserve. If you can't do that, then you're just the troll others have labeled you as.
Originally Posted By woody Dabob2: Grammar is a bit off. Are you a bit tipsy? ecdc: Terrible logic. Show me? Kar2oony didn't response to the evidence of different treatment of separation of church and state in cases of Muslims and Christians. Can you explain it with your superior logic? Instead, he diverted the conversation to his misunderstanding of my position. Typical of simpletons.
Originally Posted By woody My civility is fine with the group of ill-mannered debaters. I wonder where you get off calling me uncivil. In what post was I uncivil?
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <Dabob2: Grammar is a bit off. Are you a bit tipsy?> It's called a typo. Same way I assume a phrase like "Kar2oony didn't response to the evidence" is a typo, rather than accuse you of being drunk. <In what post was I uncivil?> Well, accusing someone of being drunk rather than responding to the points qualifies, as does "You used the word Hate so you much know a lot about the subject" (to ecdc) and "No, you're as good as the last post. You're an embarrassment" (to me). Plus there's the incivility and imbecility of "Shrillary" in the first place. If you don't like Clinton that's fine, but names like that make you sound like you're 14 years old.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 Oh, then in another thread (in which another candidate is introduced childishly as "silky pony") there was (to SPP): "You're completely off the wall. You should be gone." But uncivil? You? Naaaah.
Originally Posted By woody Dabob2: You're the smart one. How could you use bad grammar? All brilliant people might be under the influence. I didn't say you were drunk. You may slip a few drinks. >>"You used the word Hate so you much know a lot about the subject" (to ecdc) and "No, you're as good as the last post. You're an embarrassment" (to me).<< You fail to use your favorite word, IRONY. ecdc did use HATE as if his opponents are only capable of HATE. Goodness, I was being polite in saying he knows about the subject. It is true that you're only good as your last post. So I can't tell the truth? Only you would regard it as off-limits due to civility. "Shrillary" was used by political pundits. I was not original in using this term. As for the SPP, the post was deleted. SPP made accusations, which were wrong. He started the fight. Dabob2: You don't get it. I wonder why you're still here.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <Dabob2: You're the smart one. How could you use bad grammar?> A typo is not bad grammar. <All brilliant people might be under the influence. I didn't say you were drunk. You may slip a few drinks.> I can typo when perfectly sober, too. Just as you can (and did). But from this you go to "tipsy?" >>"You used the word Hate so you much know a lot about the subject" (to ecdc) and "No, you're as good as the last post. You're an embarrassment" (to me).<< <You fail to use your favorite word, IRONY.> Like a lot of people (including Alanis Morissette), it seems you don't know what the word even means. <ecdc did use HATE as if his opponents are only capable of HATE. Goodness, I was being polite in saying he knows about the subject.> That's not what he said, or even implied. You jumped to that conclusion, then accused him of something he didn't say. This is not atypical for you. <It is true that you're only good as your last post. So I can't tell the truth? Only you would regard it as off-limits due to civility.> One can respond to a post civilly or non-civilly. I'm hardly the "only" one calling you on your incivility. When enough people are telling you the same thing you can either pretend the problem doesn't exist, or do the more mature thing and take a look at what you're doing. <"Shrillary" was used by political pundits. I was not original in using this term.> Parroting a childish term makes you no less childish - in fact, only more so. At least whoever came up with it first was childish but original. Repeating it is simply childish and unoriginal. <As for the SPP, the post was deleted. SPP made accusations, which were wrong. He started the fight.> Not having seen his post, I can't say for sure. But you've started plenty. <Dabob2: You don't get it. I wonder why you're still here.> Oh, I see you for what you are, which is what bothers you.
Originally Posted By woody >>A typo is not bad grammar.<< It is bad grammar, not a mere typo. It seems like everyone here have the same political opinion. It isn't a stretch to conclude the intelligence level is about the same. Calling me childish means you're seriously unaware of your own ridiculous posts. >>Repeating it is simply childish and unoriginal.<< Again, is this the best you can do? I suppose you advanced the argument slightly by adding "unoriginal" to the retort.
Originally Posted By Maxxdadd The problem with a pissing contest is that most people who do it are not aware that a lot of the ammunition ends up dripping down their own trousers. Give it a rest, guys.
