Originally Posted By trekkeruss I don't think it needs to be bigger, but the author of the article did point out that the edges of the screen are visible to the riders on the ends especially. It's not a huge flaw, but a flaw nonetheless.
Originally Posted By BlazesOfFire exactly what he said ^^ Just because you can see the ends but again, its no big deal.
Originally Posted By danyoung >...the edges of the screen are visible to the riders on the ends especially< Well, I guess you could make the screen bigger. But then Disney would just make the ride structure bigger to put more people in there. So you're always gonna have people sitting on the outward edges. Of course I really enjoy sitting in the middle on the top row. But I have no problem readjusting my viewpoint when sitting on the side, or down low with all that footwear hanging above me. It's all part of that suspension of disbelief thing - I disbelieve there are any feet blocking my view!
Originally Posted By Goofyernmost I rode on the outside and never noticed the edge at all. I was too busy looking at the rest of it.
Originally Posted By LadyandtheTramp But the other problem (?) is also present in the middle row - you can see over the top of the screen. Rode it yesterday, from the right side, and even if you ignore the edge on the right, you see the black void at the top of the center. While I still love the attraction, seeing the blank top was disappointing. We actually talked between us about how it would be nice if Disney would just show sky up there. Something to hide the edge of the movie.
Originally Posted By theunion >>This article is like 10 months late. I hate the Washington Times, I read the Post.<< The Post is trash.......
Originally Posted By Labuda Why>? Because they quote the president exactly instead of leaving out all the "ums" "ers" and things like that in an effort to make him appear more intelligent than the average 12-year-old?
Originally Posted By vbdad55 Why>? Because they quote the president exactly instead of leaving out all the "ums" "ers" and things like that in an effort to make him appear more intelligent than the average 12-year-old? Ann, Ann , Ann -- let it go.......at least the Post was able to include pix of all teh grilfriends of the previous Pres. with him, although he was an elegant speaker !
