The "Consensus" is being questioned...

Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan

>>Certainly, he hasn't learned how to write a good joke.<<

I've never let that stop me.

 

Originally Posted By Dabob2

>>Again, SPP's comment was sarcastic. Try to keep up.<<

<Try to mean what you say. If it was sarcastic, then he has poor use of language to convey it. Certainly, he hasn't learned how to write a good joke.>

Notice I put a LOL immediately after it. I got it. You didn't. That's all.

>>And it's not the scientist I'm calling an idiot. Only someone who would read what he said, and not understand that the difference in the time scale alone would be enough to make the two eras completely different would qualify for that term.<<

<Of course, the scientist never argued that the time scale disqualifies his study in application to today.>

And why would he? He said the time scale made the two time periods completely different. It really shouldn't be difficult to understand.

<That is still to be further analyzed. Only you would completely misinterpret his comment to mean "fundamentally different" than what he intented.>

I interpreted his comments correctly. The two time periods are completely different. That's what he "intented" to say, that's what he did say, and it's really not that difficult to understand.

<The article is consistent from beginning to end. You're inconsistent and full of nonsense.>

The article is consistent. The trouble is you continue to show that you don't understand what it said.

 

Originally Posted By woody

>>Notice I put a LOL immediately after it. I got it. You didn't. That's all<<

So you were in the joke? That's a lame answer.

The rest of your post is just as meaningless.

 

Originally Posted By Dabob2

Not IN on the joke, just that I GOT the joke. And you didn't. Simple as that.

The rest of the post just explains how you didn't even understand the link you yourself posted. Which you continue to demonstrate. You can attempt to dismiss it by calling it "meaningless," but that dog won't hunt. The proof is there for all to see.

 

Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder

His response to my 14th Amendment question officially cememted his position on my not to be taken seriously list. He can come on here and spout nonsense, make insults, embarrass himself, I don't care.

 

Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder

cememted

cemented it, even

 

Originally Posted By DVC_dad

Speaking of "...that dog won't hunt..." I don't even know what the 14th amendment says, but I've got the 2nd one down "pert darn good."

<--- joke.