Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Back it up.> Again? How many times must we do this? <a href="http://www.husseinandterror.com/" target="_blank">http://www.husseinandterror.co m/</a>
Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder "Again? How many times must we do this?" Until you can find an unbiased source.
Originally Posted By gadzuux Although it's "telling" that the link is by a fellow of the hoover institution, yet is written for someone with a first grade reading level. It's propaganda to be spoon fed to the red state masses.
Originally Posted By mrichmondj It's a one sided piece that makes zero effort to explore any contradictions to the initial thesis. But we alreay knew this. It still begs the questions -- if it is so important for us to overthrow the terrorists, why aren't we making pre-emptive strikes against the governments of Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria, and several rogue states of the former Soviet Union? There is far more intelligence linking those nations to active terrorist cells than there ever was in Iraq.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <It's a one sided piece that makes zero effort to explore any contradictions to the initial thesis.> So that's a no. <There is far more intelligence linking those nations to active terrorist cells than there ever was in Iraq.> While that may be true, it has nothing to do with what was asserted.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh I disagree. I think it's being asserted merely to critize Republicans. When the Clinton administration bombed Iraq, and told us that Saddam was supporting terrorism and pursuing WMD's, liberals didn't claim he shouldn't act, because other countries were doing similar things.
