Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan But DAR is right. What the Democrats should be doing is spending all their time coming up with ways to answer questions about the president's religion, where he was really born and other all-important issues lobbed by the GOP.
Originally Posted By disneydad109 would he have found his fame if he had kept his real name, The hebrew hammer, Chaim Witz
Originally Posted By utahjosh It's a nice logo, but it just screams Obama. As leader of the party I guess that's fine. They'll probably change it once Obama has moved on.
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan They could have gone all emoticon with it: : D For the Republicans: : R (looks like it's throwing up a little) For the Tea Party: ~ >: E For confused moderates: {: ?
Originally Posted By DAR <<But DAR is right. What the Democrats should be doing is spending all their time coming up with ways to answer questions about the president's religion, where he was really born and other all-important issues lobbed by the GOP.>> And that's all crap too. I've always said that. But in both cases it's not focusing on the issues. When the head of the DNC or RNC says there's a big announcement you kind hope it's something of substance. But that's just my opinion as much as people here don't care for it.
Originally Posted By plpeters70 In all seriousness, I will say that it was probably stupid timing for this sort of thing. People are going to be saying just what DAR is - why are they making a big deal out of a logo while the economy is tanking, etc. While I know that they can focus on more than one thing at a time, and unveiling a logo isn't a big deal, it was probably a stupid move from a PR perspective. It just makes them look out of touch - which I'm really starting to think is true about most people in Washington. I just don't think they live on the same planet as the rest of us. (Like the tax breaks for the wealthy - it should be a no-brainer to let those tax cuts expire for the wealthy - and yet, it's a major political fire-storm. Just crazy!)
Originally Posted By Sport Goofy The House Minority Leader, John Boehner, focuses way too much time on makeup and the tanning bed. I prefer a logo, I think.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "But that's just my opinion as much as people here don't care for it." DAR please stop. You're being dishonest. You know as well as everyone else that the folks who work on the organization's identity have nothing to do with elections or establishing policy for the party.
Originally Posted By CuriouserConstance First of all, why don't I see the new logo when I click on the links? Second, Dar, this is just silly. You're just trying to stir up trouble. You're just trying to push everyone to the edge so you can blast off some other "so long" post. This time instead of listing everything that's on tv, you'll do something even more clever like writing the alphabet in reverse order or counting by 2's till you reach 100.
Originally Posted By ChurroMonster I applaud the Democrats for trying to re-brand themselves. It's not going to work.
Originally Posted By mawnck YUCK. I hates it. Words that come to mind include small, generic, corporate, noncommittal, inoffensive .... Yep, it's perfect. (And I don't get the jumping on DAR's case in this one. We certainly post enough topics with a flagrantly anti-Republican spin in the topic name, why can't he do the same with the Dems?)
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "We certainly post enough topics with a flagrantly anti-Republican spin in the topic name, why can't he do the same with the Dems?" Oh come on.
