The Factor and Vermont!

Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder

^^^You understood that quote, Tom? I re-read that a few times and couldn't make sense of it.

As Tom and Dabob have labored to point out, this judge meted out sentence within the constraints of the law. Judges simply can't be "fired". Recall him if necessary, but learn more first. Molestation is obviously a hot button issue guaranteed to bring out heated reactions. To imply the judge doesn't care is simply ludicrous.

 

Originally Posted By cape cod joe

You're wrong! If you can say things that aren't true Pass, you must be accountable. Watch the Factor and learn.
Judge could be impeached, stopped from judging criminal complaints, and a whole lot of other things (IMMEDIATELY)!
He could have given 8 years "within the constraints of the law" as you put it. BUT the Judge was interested in the rapist and his TREATMENT instead of the victim, a little girl. Treatment does NOT work and you cannot argue unless you give me proof. For decades, research indicates that treatment does not work for child molesters. It DOESN'T! I know quite well being brought up in Catholic Schools that Priests CANNOT be rehabbed and child molesters CANNOT. Rant and rave like the Ted Kennedys of the world, but I want to 1)protect my children and other children; 2)Have justice and get rid of the vermin judge who DOESN'T care about the children.

 

Originally Posted By TomSawyer

Dude, try a little decaf

 

Originally Posted By cape cod joe

Tom
I think sticking on topic about such a serious subject is more important than "Dude" or personality propensities.
Maybe make a cogent point but dude and caffeine doesn't help us to alleviate the epidemic of child molestation and judges who don't care
Thanks Tom

 

Originally Posted By Beaumandy

The judge has no business worrying about rehab.

This is what we mean by activist judges, and yes Tom, your buying into it as expected.

The judge has a job to sentence the criminal to a jail term to meet the crime. End of story, no more liberal mushy spin job that puts kids in danger.

The state of Vermont is NOT trying to pass the minimum 25 year sentence. They are stalling and not taking it serious.

Would you Tom want this guy to get an automatic 25 years? It sure doen't sound like it since your trying to justify this idiots ruling.

Did anyone watch the factor last night or are you going to yout left wing sites and CNN to get your lame arguments?

 

Originally Posted By Beaumandy

By the way, O'Reilly has talked about the news stories Tom mentioned in detail.

It backs up his point that the entire state is backing the judge giving a child rapist 2 MONTHS in prison.

Liberal states suck... you want your kids to get killed or raped?? Live in one of these states and the odds go way up.

 

Originally Posted By cape cod joe

Thanks Beau!
Evidently some people have nothing to say so resort to "dude" decaffeinated and it is a transparent red-herring technique to obfuscate the truth----------ala Hillary Clinton with the "plantation" remark when she has nothing else to say.

 

Originally Posted By cape cod joe

To Beau-
That's exactly why the fam and I are buying a lot of real estate in Orlando presently as we love the Cape, BUT it is tough to take it when Ted lives literally right down the street as do many other celebrity lefties.
Are you getting out of Oregon too? hehe
"My state is worse than your state" ha ha

 

Originally Posted By Beaumandy

No problem Joe. America is pissed about this judge and the attitude in Vermont regarding a 2 month jial term for a child rapist.

Yet here we have our own LP liberals arguing for the judge.

Then, these people wonder why America refused to put them in power.

Make no mistake, when liberals are in power, the criminals win, terrorists win, socialism wins.

The facts are there to prove this.

 

Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder

Post 82, thanks for proving my points in post 81.

 

Originally Posted By TomSawyer


>>It backs up his point that the entire state is backing the judge giving a child rapist 2 MONTHS in prison.<<

But that simply isn't true. It's a lie.

 

Originally Posted By Beaumandy

Oregon is pathetic. We have socialism running wild here with the liberals.

We also have the worst laws on the books to protect kids..

Ted Kennedy .... The Cape Cod Orka.

Joe, stick around. It's nice to have a normal thinking person on these boards for a change.

Normal as in, if America voted on these debates, our argument would always win with the people.

I wonder what the vote would be for a poll that asks if a child rapist should get 2 MONTHS in jail and much concerm about his f'n rehab?

80-20% is my guess.

 

Originally Posted By TomSawyer

>>I wonder what the vote would be for a poll that asks if a child rapist should get 2 MONTHS in jail and much concerm about his f'n rehab?<<

That poll wouldn't accurately reflect what happened or what the sentence was, Beau.

 

Originally Posted By Beaumandy

Sorry Tom, I should have said MOST of the media is backing the judge, like you are.

STPH is wrong legally again. The judges ruling was illegal according to the GA in Vermont.

But whats new.

 

Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder

<a href="http://www.ajs.org/js/VT_methods.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ajs.org/js/VT_metho
ds.htm</a>

Relevant section:
REMOVAL OF JUDGES

Vermont judges may be removed in one of two ways:

Judges may be impeached by a two-thirds vote of the house of representatives and convicted by a two-thirds vote of the senate.

The judicial conduct board investigates complaints of judicial misconduct or disability and recommends any necessary action to the supreme court. Possible disciplinary actions include public reprimand of the judge, suspension for a part or the remainder of the judge's term of office, or retirement of the judge if physically or mentally disabled.

Impeachment is tantamount to recall, for all intents and purposes. Given the secnario here, it is highly unlikely the Vermont judge has anything happen to him at all.

Back in 1996 or 1997, I forget which, O.J. Simpson was granted custody of his children by an Orange County Superior Court judge after he was found not guilty in Los Angeles Superior Court. The judge's name is Nancy Wieben-Stock, and there was a hue and cry to get her ousted after her decision. Nothing came of it. I've appeared before her and she's a well qualified and fair bench officer. Matter of fact, she's currently the Presiding Judge for Orange County.

 

Originally Posted By bboisvert

<<Liberal states suck>>

Beau, you live in a Blue state. Is Measure 11 too liberal for you?

 

Originally Posted By cape cod joe

I'll repeat what Beau said
According to the Attorney General of Vt.
The judge's ruling was ILLEGAL!
Can people not understand words here?
It would be helpful if people saw the factor before they commented on the factor
And for the record ftr
I am an INDEPENDENT and think freely on ALL issues i.e you cannot prognosticate what I will think until you ask me.
FREE and clear thinking is my motto

 

Originally Posted By cape cod joe

I'll repeat what Beau said
According to the Attorney General of Vt.
The judge's ruling was ILLEGAL!
Can people not understand words here?
It would be helpful if people saw the factor before they commented on the factor
And for the record ftr
I am an INDEPENDENT and think freely on ALL issues i.e you cannot prognosticate what I will think until you ask me.
FREE and clear thinking is my motto

 

Originally Posted By peeaanuut

<<I am an INDEPENDENT and think freely on ALL issues i.e you cannot prognosticate what>>

You are not an independant. You are Beau's twin if I have ever seen one.

 

Originally Posted By TomSawyer

>>According to the Attorney General of Vt.
The judge's ruling was ILLEGAL!<<

Can you post a link to his exact words?