Originally Posted By mawnck <a href="http://www.latimes.com/busines" target="_blank">http://www.latimes.com/busines</a> s/la-fi-tinkerbell21dec21,1,7591939.story?track=rss
Originally Posted By mawnck ^^ An article that apparently thinks that DisneyToon and WDFA are the same thing. Jim's source has been busy . . . . (Sorry to post the link again - itchy Submit finger)
Originally Posted By BlueOhanaTerror Read the article. Watch this story change. I'm convinced the project is not in that much trouble. I could be wrong, but having just looked things over recently... I'd be pretty surprised if they went into such a radical overhaul - for a second time. The first overhaul was very much a full redirect of the story. I definitely agree that the film doesn't skew to older girls, but they were never really TRYING to do that. And to think that "older" girls are EVER going to flip for "Disney Faeries" is, I think, wishful thinking. They should develop more properties ala "Kim Possible" if they want to accomplish that.
Originally Posted By BlueOhanaTerror Mawnck is correct... this project is definitely NOT under WDFA, and never has been. Lasseter has oversight over all these divisions. >>>The unit is in the process of firing about 160 of its 800 employees as it slows production to about one movie every 18 months from one movie every year. Pixar has kept its offices in Emeryville, Calif., which are not being cut back.<<<
Originally Posted By t1lersm0m I was all excited reading this thread, as I didn't know they were making a Tinker Bell movie, until I read Britney Murphy is playing Tink. I like her, but couldn't they get someone better?
