Originally Posted By MPierce >> I miss the powder soap. You felt CLEAN after a round with that. << I prefer the Apiana line of soaps personally.
Originally Posted By MPierce The Mouse weilds a very big stick, and he has an extreme complusion to use it.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> The Mouse weilds a very big stick, and he has an extreme complusion to use it. << Sounds like a new Limited Edition Vinylmation thingy.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Mickey's stick....Wasn't that on the EPCOT ball for about 7 years? /inuendo
Originally Posted By Ursula If the Twitter girl's last name was Disney, would they still be able to take it away from her?
Originally Posted By -em >>Can't blame Disney execs for chianging the soap...but you can blame the idiots who seriously thought it was Anthrax. Jeeze.<< I was working 'rails one night during the "anthrax scare" and had a family rush out to tell me there was a "mysterious powder" in the 'rail and that I needed to call someone. Indeed there was powder. In 4 identical lightly colored piles, with a smarties wrapper attached to 1 of them. I'm not the smartest cookie in the jar but declared the 'rail safe. Anyways- I remember everything remotely powdered disappeared for a while. The soap was the only thing not to return.
Originally Posted By joe80x86 I can't really blame TWDC and I think anyone who registers a name on based on a large companies name is asking for it to be taken away at some point. Had she registered something like DisneyRocks then she might still have it. I also think TWDC had a strong trade mark case if she was twittering about Disney or the parks. I am sure many will disagree but one only need to look at the MikeRowSoft.com case from a decade or so ago. I am no legal scholar and this is absolutely my opinion on this and I have been proven wrong before though.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 <<The Mouse weilds a very big stick, and he has an extreme complusion to use it.>> I've heard the same about some of the bois in Glendale ...
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 <<Paranoia does funny things when the world is broken...>> Sheep ... sheep ... I think I need to sleep since I'm talking 'bout sheep.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 <<I can't really blame TWDC and I think anyone who registers a name on based on a large companies name is asking for it to be taken away at some point. Had she registered something like DisneyRocks then she might still have it. I also think TWDC had a strong trade mark case if she was twittering about Disney or the parks.>> I strongly disagree (as I see an add on the same page shilling Jeff Lange's Wishes DVD). Disney can't simply take anything with the name 'Disney' in it. What if this woman's name was Disney? Their picking and choosing who they want to go after (trust me as someone who has been approached about writing books on the company). <<I am sure many will disagree but one only need to look at the MikeRowSoft.com case from a decade or so ago.>> I'm not familiar with it. <<I am no legal scholar and this is absolutely my opinion on this and I have been proven wrong before though.>> That makes two of us on both counts!
