Originally Posted By Roger55 My question is... where are all the angry HKDL fans???? Their castle too was replaced with the logo change. LOL I don't like the new logo. I wish they kept the old one. Not because I'm a left coaster, but more because I just like the old tradtional castle. Some things I like updated and modernized, other things I don't. In this case, I would have rather they left it alone. JMO.
Originally Posted By Hans Reinhardt "Their castle too was replaced with the logo change." I suppose that it all boils down to nostalgia. The same reason you have DCA bashers lamenting the possible closure of Magic Mountain. Go figure. There's much more to see and do at WDW. For me DLR is a one or two day thing, while WDW is at least three or four.
Originally Posted By jomach08 Post 21.... ROFL To me it seemed like a combination of the 2. I'll admit I favor DL over MK(I also agree with the previous assessment of WDW vs DLR), but I wasn't upset over the "replacement". Like it was mentioned in the other thread, it looks too much like a commercial. That's what angered me more.
Originally Posted By Disney Joy well dah ~ as I said before I didn't notice a thing...now I want to see it - to see what all this hoola is about. LOL
Originally Posted By JuiceMonkey Outside of this board, i might be one of the most rabid Disneyland purists I know but I honestly don't care about the new logo one way or the other.
Originally Posted By imadisneygal Rule #1. Walt Disney World will NEVER replace Disneyland. Rule #2. If you think that WDW has replaced Disneyland, please see rule #1. It's the original, the genuine spirit...nothing will ever replace it not matter whose castle appears in a logo.
Originally Posted By imadisneygal Rule #1. Walt Disney World will NEVER replace Disneyland. Rule #2. If you think that WDW has replaced Disneyland, please see rule #1. It's the original, the genuine spirit...nothing will ever replace it no matter whose castle appears in a logo.
Originally Posted By TALL Disney Guy I'll admit, I would have seethed if I had seen POTC and seen the logo change---because I would have immediately thought they got rid of SB's castle in favor of Cindy's. This has nothing to do with the parks (though I do prefer WDW), but that SB is my favorite movie of all time and I've always loved that it's that castle which is the universal Disney logo. But then in the other thread about this I saw it's not actually Cindy's castle but "a" castle that has resemblances of both, so I can take that, lol. ;-)
Originally Posted By PirateJohn >>one thing that will never change - Walt built Disneyland first. Walt built Disneyland, period.
Originally Posted By Mermaid Princess [imadisneygal wrote: "Apparently I REALLY meant that post. Sorry for the double..."] XD That made me laugh. Anyway, I noticed the change, shruged and figured that they made the change because the new castle, whether it is Cindy's or a combination of the two, was bigger. Bigger is better right? I haven't ever been to WDW so I can't really compare the two parks, but I don't think it's about those specific parks anyway. As someone stated before, hong kong, has the sleeping beauty castle. And, Tokyo has the Cindy castle... If you look at all the parks it's about even in which they built. So it's really not shocking that they would use a Cindy castle. I think that if people are really shocked and think that it's some sort of diss on the SB castle, or that there is some sort of rivalry going on they are just being silly and a little ethnocentric. My two cents.
