Originally Posted By mawnck <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT</a>
Originally Posted By DVC_dad Allow me to rephrase... Well I assume everyone here reading these posts knows why Tom may have a greater insight on the subject than I do. And that I think a lot of him, being the only LP'er that I have ever met, have ever had over to my home to meet my family, and that he is someone I have a great deal of respect for. How's that?
Originally Posted By gadzuux Gay - Lesbian - Bisexual - Transgender. Often acronymed as LGBT - it's important to lesbians that they're not subordinate to men.
Originally Posted By FaMulan X, this: >>>And if you don't think that a large number of fence sitters made their choice to vote "D" based somewhat to largely on HER, you've really lost touch with reality as far as I'm concerned.<<< is laughable.<< It is, is it? Then you are laughing at ME because I was firmly on the fence leaning toward McCain when he announced is runningmate. Upon learning more about her, I found that she was most definitley NOT THE PERSON I WANTED IN THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL SPOT and so I voted Obama.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Stop making personal attacks . . . Attack the issue, but attack it with facts.> That would be a nice change.
Originally Posted By DVC_dad Well... *ahem* I guess post 246 clears ALL of this up nice and tidy. DyG I acquiesce to your claim.
Originally Posted By FaMulan RE: 174 Yes, that was my post from the linked topic. But you don't know me. I am affiliated wit NO political party. I vote my conscience and up until McCain's error in choosing his runningmate, I was in favor of voting for him because of his longevity of public service and military background. That's what makes me different than those who are blinded by various "Party Lines" and don't open their eyes and see what's in front of them.
Originally Posted By DVC_dad Fair enough. You are right, I don't know you and I cannot possibly know what you think or believe.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <<Stop making personal attacks . . . Attack the issue, but attack it with facts.>> <That would be a nice change.> Indeed it would. Of course, I just did so in the Pirates thread, and elsewhere. Have yet to see it from you, however. And I'm sorry if the above seems like more tit for tat, piperlyne, but you may not remember the days when Douglas actually posted intelligently and thoughtfully and we had good back-and-forths. I keep calling him on his nonsense because I know he's capable of better. But when I try to say something of substance and am met with mindlessness (see 41/42, for example)... perhaps I should just let it go, but I DO expect better from Doug and so I pipe up. There are people like mawnck who haven't been around as long who were surprised that he ever did anything BUT the nonsense, but he used to. Really. I keep waiting for that guy to come back.
Originally Posted By DAR Three things are certain in life: death, taxes, Doug and Dabob will go back on forth in such a manner.
Originally Posted By piperlynne >><<Stop making personal attacks . . . Attack the issue, but attack it with facts.>> <That would be a nice change.> Indeed it would. Of course, I just did so in the Pirates thread, and elsewhere. Have yet to see it from you, however. And I'm sorry if the above seems like more tit for tat, piperlyne, but you may not remember the days when Douglas actually posted intelligently and thoughtfully and we had good back-and-forths. I keep calling him on his nonsense because I know he's capable of better. But when I try to say something of substance and am met with mindlessness (see 41/42, for example)... perhaps I should just let it go, but I DO expect better from Doug and so I pipe up. There are people like mawnck who haven't been around as long who were surprised that he ever did anything BUT the nonsense, but he used to. Really. I keep waiting for that guy to come back.<< I don't think you guys are the only ones guilty of it. And in some ways it is amusing. I just don't know if people realize how much it detracts from whatever else they have to say. People on these boards are really thoughtful and insightful and I love seeing the banter. (I admit I am a left leaning moderate, but I like hearing things that make me think or possibly reconsider a position) I don't want to tell anyway how to use their posts or what to do. I just needed to vent because I see too many topics that are really interesting to me get derailed and abandoned after the sniping ensues. And now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <I keep waiting for that guy to come back.> So he can distort, dismiss, and denigrate my comments, like he did when I tried to answer the health care question with substance. If it looks like I'm being childish or flippant in my remarks to some posters, it's because I've discovered they aren't worth substantive replies. If they want honest and intelligent debate from me, then all they need to do is start discussing the issues honestly and intelligently.
Originally Posted By piperlynne LOL Maybe we could make a "sniping and denigrating WE posts" thread and put all those types of posts there with links to the other topics. <-- ok that's a little OCD for me. Yikes
Originally Posted By mele I think that Doug loves coming here and having every thread turn into him vs. the world. Clearly he loves it or he'd leave. Let's not give him the energy he craves. Maybe he'll be inspired to give more inciteful posts to get attention istead of the taking the easy way out.