Originally Posted By Sara Tonin Well, this is your highest level of maturity? You don't have to respond to me...makes no difference to me. But, I will continue to respond to whomever I want. You can take your empirical statement, "And you don't address me anymore and we'll leave it at that.", and you know what you can do with that. You are unbelieveable.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <So let's not act like I haven't been baited in the past.> That's beside the point I was making. Even if you feel you've been baited, there are certain things beyond the pale (and community standards). <Sara I am sorry for calling you what I did I truly do apologize for that. > There - that's all I'm talking about.
Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder And in the end The love you take Is equal to the love you make.
Originally Posted By mawnck You are so sexy bom Gonna make me crazy bom We're gonna do the bom bom Ain't that amazing bom I'm very busy bom It's not so easy bom I'm gonna tease you bom bom Without a reason bom I'll call you on the phone You speak in monotone Don't wanna be alone Because I'm crazy bom Baby, baby you're so fine Be my, be my valentine Baby, baby you're so fine Be my, be my valentine My pride and prejudice I will just reminisce These are the things you can't miss Come on, give me a kiss There's nothing dangerous I know what's waitin' on us We'll keep each other restless Oh boy, you look impressed The charm that I possess Will put you to the test To satisfy my interest Come over, be my guest I'll show you to my nest You're under arrest The others may be jealous 'Cause you're the one who's blessed Baby, baby you're so fine Be my, be my valentine Baby, baby you're so fine Be my, be my valentine Yeah, aha... You are sexy – bom You are sexy – bom Really crazy – bom You and you and you Anti-crisis – bom Baby, I can save your world I'm your anti-crisis girl Baby, I can save your world I'm your anti-crisis girl
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <I still don't like her though.> You don't have to. I was standin' at the counter I was waitin' for the change When I heard that old familiar music start It was like a lighted match Had been tossed into my soul It was like a dam had broken in my heart After taking ev'ry detour Gettin' lost and losin' track So that even if I wanted I could not find my way back After drivin' out the mem'ry Of the way things might have been After I'd forgotten all about us The song remembers when We were rolling through the Rockies We were up above the clouds When a station out of Jackson played that song And it seemed to fit the moment And the moment seemed to freeze When we turned the music up and sang along And there was a God in Heaven And the world made perfect sense We were young and were in love And we were easy to convince We were headed straight for Eden It was just around the bend And though I have forgotten all about it The song remembers when (Bridge I guess somethin' must have happened And we must have said goodbye And my heart must have been broken Though I can't recall just why The song remembers when Well, for all the miles between us And for all the time that's passed You would think I haven't gotten very far And I hope my hasty heart Will forgive me just this once If I stop to wonder how on earth you are But that's just a lot of water Underneath a bridge I burned And there's no use in backtrackin' Around corners I have turned Still I guess some things we bury Are just bound to rise again For even if the whole world has forgotten The song remembers when Yeah, and even if the whole world has forgotten The song remembers when
Originally Posted By Sara Tonin Of course he doesn't have to like me, I don't expect anyone to like me...If I was concerned about people liking me I'd be making up very pretty/muy caliente threads all day.
Originally Posted By mawnck And it's back on! Courtesy of the Tea Party Convention in Nashville .... The combatants: Andrew Breitbart, founder of biggovernment.com (home of James O'Keefe) and Joseph Farah, founder of wnd.com (home of the birthers). >>I told Farah that his speech was getting negative attention already, and that Breitbart, who’d taken the stage after him, had criticized the “birther” parts of the speech. Farah shook his head and walked over to Breitbart in what seemed like an attempt to debunk my question. “Andrew is my friend,” said Farah. “He has the right to disagree, and he has the right to say anything to a socialist newspaper that he wants. And if he wants to criticize his friend to you, and he’s dumb enough to do that…” Breitbart raised his eyebrows. “I’m dumb to do what?” “Criticize your friend to this socialist newspaper.” “I was talking to her,” said Breitbart, pointing to Schilling. “I was talking to you. And I was saying that I disagreed on the birther stuff.” “OK, well, did you know that Dave Weigel from The Washington Independent was”– “I was talking to her,” said Breitbart. “She was asking me if I thought it was wise to bring it up, and I said, no. We have a lot of strong arguments to be making, and that is a primary argument. That is an argument for the primaries that did not take hold. The arguments that these people right here are making are substantive arguments. The elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts were all won not on birther, but on substance. And to apply to this group of people the concept that they’re all obsessed with the birth certificate, when it’s not a winning issue–” “It is a winning issue!” “It’s not a winning issue.” “It is! It becomes even more of a winning issue when the press abrogates its responsibility–” “You don’t recognize it as a fundamentally controversial issue that forces a unified group of people to have to break into different parts? It is a schism of the highest order.” “Nothing exposes the president’s–” “Then prove it!” “The press isn’t asking the question–” “Prove it!” “Prove what?” “Prove your case.” “I should prove, what, a birth certificate that may or may not exist?” Farah had gotten irritated. “That’s ridiculous. You don’t even understand the fundamental tenets of what journalism is about, Andrew. It’s not about proving things. It’s about asking questions and seeking truth.” Breitbart tensed up after that insult. “Right.” “I know you’re not a journalist, so that’s fine. But don’t diminish people who’ve been doing this for 35 years.” “So you’re going to go on record saying that I’m not a journalist?” “Are you? I’ve never heard you claim to be. Are you?” “I’ll let it be answered by you.” “Well, I knew Drudge didn’t consider himself a journalist, so I assumed that you were. … I don’t know, I’m not trying to insult you.” “You did.” At that point, Judson Phillips — who had spotted a very small crowd around us — walked into the fray and tried to simmer everyone down with a joke.<< <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/75949/birther-speaker-takes-heat-at-tea-party-convention" target="_blank">http://washingtonindependent.c...nvention</a> Go, wingnuts, go! Fire up that crazy! Democrats sweep in 2010!
Originally Posted By mawnck >>There's trouble brewing between the Ron Paul libertarians who staged the the first modern tea party in 2007 by dumping tea into Boston Harbor, and the neocon war hawks led by Sarah Palin who are furiously trying to hijack their message. After I appeared on MSNBC talking about Sarah Palin's appearance at the Nashville tea party convention, several libertarians told me they were unhappy with the exchange. I said that Sarah Palin's hawkish message on Iran was oddly out of place in a group whose roots belong to the Ron Paul libertarians, particularly as the anti-interventionist Rand Paul is looking strong in the Kentucky Senate Senate race -- and Palin just endorsed him. The woman who appeared with me representing the tea partiers disagreed with that premise, and claimed she was very much an interventionist. My libertarian friends couldn't imagine what she was doing on TV representing the tea parties in the first place, and thought it was a sad day when the opposition stated their position more fairly than their supposed allies.<< >>Ron Paul has been tireless in taking his message to college campuses, and he has tremendous support among younger people who identify themselves as fiscal conservatives but are uncomfortable with fundies and their gay-bashing. But as the libertarian message is gaining traction, it is being hijacked by the Neocons -- and Sarah "bridge to nowhere" Palin leads the parade. Ron Paul supporters were outraged by Palin's speech and the whopping fee she charged for her appearance at the Nashville convention. It's completely incoherent that there are now tea party-identified candidates trying to oust Ron Paul himself from his seat. I hope the libertarians lay down markers and come down on the side of ending the war and ConAgra's corporate welfare, and showing Palin -- and her many bombs -- to the door.<< <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/will-palin-and-the-neocon_b_456824.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...824.html</a>
Originally Posted By mawnck >>I am sending an alarm to the Tea Party membership! Be alert to turncoats and deceivers being herded into the Tea Party by usurpers from the weakened Republican Party for the sole purpose of capturing our populist movement. Our political ideals were once theirs and our immense growth has created a lusting for their good old days! Sarah Palin’s well delivered speech and her attractive demeanor is little more than a veneer for her less attractive political philosophy. She seems more like a duck out of water among true Conservative Constitutionalists. Palin demonstrates her NeoCon flippant viewpoint and her naïveté as she seems envious of the swelled numbers of Patriots pledging their allegiance, to of all things, AMERICA and not to a kool-aid ridden political dinosaur. << >>Sarah Palin is not dense or erroneous in her view of the Tea Party, just the opposite. She represents a growing insider’s attack to the heart of the Tea Party. Very much like a wolf in sheep’s clothing entering in at the gate as an ally, but for all intents and purposes there to seize and capture, not only one or two stray sheep, but the whole flock! << <a href="http://www.teaparty.org/" target="_blank">http://www.teaparty.org/</a> Much more - you won't BELIEVE how much more - at the link. (PS - a duck out of water?)
Originally Posted By gadzuux Paranoia strikes deep into the hearts of those that are fearful. This reads like "red under every bed" stuff.
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan Wingnut fight! Rush Limbaugh mocks Bill O'Reilly.... <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201002190030" target="_blank">http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/2...02190030</a> Since Lumpball sets the tone in the GOP today, this will be interesting. Sarah Palin clearly was too frightened of him to call him out for his "retard" remarks. Will O'Reilly take a swipe back? They eat their own in wingnut land...
Originally Posted By Mr X They are DEFINITELY eating their own. And to think I was rather shocked at the shoddy treatment that Colon Powell received at the hands of Rove, Cheney and others after his years of dedication to that party...little did I know that was just the tip of the iceberg! By the time they finish purity testing they'll be just Rush left, methinks (I've already read accusations of RINO against Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, John Boener, and of course O'Reilly...who the hell even remains in this party of none!?)
Originally Posted By mawnck >>But (Mike) Huckabee also brought up more than once the incivility of politics today. He warned that this is damaging to politics and getting things done. He did not spare conservatives, saying that anonymous bloggers said mean and uncivil things about him recently when he brought President Obama's wife, Michelle, onto his Fox cable show to support and elaborate on her efforts to fight child obesity. "Some bloggers, it seemed, wanted me to bring her on my show only if I yelled at her. Or it seemed they wanted me to hit her." He said he disagrees with nearly every policy position of her husband, but that attacking people doesn't accomplish anything. The viciousness of attacks from all sides, he said, are "disgusting ... the anger and the meanness."<<
