Originally Posted By demderedoseguys ><<If Disney Wants to compete with Universal, they need to add More thrill rides.>> Blazes, how do you feel about this ?
Originally Posted By nats30 The reason I started the new thread was because the first thread was too long.
Originally Posted By Jim in Merced CA It's cool nats30. It's not like we don't have 4 or 5 threads on the submarine lagoon filling with water, so I think you're okay.
Originally Posted By pixiedust1 We love the older rides and leave the newer ones to the younger crowd... You need some thrills to get the teens to come... We go now, and could care less if we do any attractions at all.. We love to vegg on a bench, When the family meets, one group runs for thier FT's for the thrill rides and we sit and relax under a tree.. then they ride the slow ones with us when their done getting their thrills...LOL.. something for everyone...
Originally Posted By t1lersm0m <<The reason I started the new thread was because the first thread was too long.>> Sorry, you have every right to start a new thread. I hope this one does better.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 <Well, WDW's Themepark are boaring as they are with only about 2 or 3 Thrill rides per park. If Disney Wants to compete with Universal, they need to add More thrill rides. < That's just it, they don't want to compete with IOA etc.--- they leave that for Six Flags....for people bored with Disney ( they are 50M a year who are not) - those other parks are for you - a completely different experience.
Originally Posted By oc_dean >>It's cool nats30. It's not like we don't have 4 or 5 threads on the submarine lagoon filling with water, << Imagine how many topics there'll be on sighting an imagineer farting around on the defunct Peoplemover track?
