Originally Posted By DouglasDubh Again, I invite anyone to go read the threads in question, and see who is interested in honest debate, and who wants to just be insulting, and shout down critics.
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <<"Liar" may be a bit strong, and perhaps Douglas was simply mistaken, but if so, he should own up to it like a man and perhaps we could get THAT sub-thread of unpleasantness out of the way.>> <I'll admit that I probably should have gone back and reviewed the thread before I wrote what I did, and I might have said it a little differently. But I'll stick by my assertion that Jon often states or implies that the scientific concensus on man-made global warming is something other than what it is.> So, a mini "mea culpa" followed by a "basically I'm still right." Oh well. <Again, I invite anyone to go read the threads in question, and see who is interested in honest debate, and who wants to just be insulting, and shout down critics.> I actually bothered to do so, and there's plenty of bad behavior to go around.
Originally Posted By jonvn "So, a mini "mea culpa" followed by a a "basically I'm still right." Oh well." That's right. And he's also going around telling other people what I'm supposedly saying, which is not what I'm saying. It's not honesty, and why i'm on this tear right now about it.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <And he's also going around telling other people what I'm supposedly saying, which is not what I'm saying.> What are you saying? Again, who said the things Richard Branson said, if not Richard Branson?
Originally Posted By jonvn "What are you saying?" I'm saying you're a dishonest person. That should be quite clear, and that I'm not interested in talking to people who engage in such behavior.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <I'm saying you're a dishonest person.> And you're wrong about that, like you're wrong about global warming. <That should be quite clear, and that I'm not interested in talking to people who engage in such behavior.> I don't know, you seem pretty interested in talking to everyone. You just don't seem interested in listening to anyone.
Originally Posted By jonvn 'And you're wrong about that,' Becaue i've caught you lying now, it's not. So, are you a holoaust denier, too, by any chance? How about if I just started going around saying that? "You just don't seem interested in listening to anyone." I'm not interested in listening to liars, nuts, and the haplessly dull, no. You fall into that category.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Becaue i've caught you lying now, it's not.> I've never lied here, since I've never intentionally deceived anyone. <So, are you a holoaust denier, too, by any chance?> No. <How about if I just started going around saying that?> That would be a lie. Just like how you keep calling me a liar is a lie. <I'm not interested in listening to liars, nuts, and the haplessly dull, no.> You're also not interested in listening to people who don't agree with you. <You fall into that category.> Well, no.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh So anyway, you still haven't answered the question. Who said the things Richard Branson said, if not Richard Branson?
Originally Posted By jonvn So you are saying you are not a holocaust denier is that it? "Who said the things Richard Branson said, if not Richard Branson?" This has already been answered at least twice, nut. But then then, you refuse to admit you are a holocaust denier, so what's the difference?
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <So you are saying you are not a holocaust denier is that it?> That's correct. <This has already been answered at least twice, nut.> No, it hasn't. If it has, prove me wrong and show me where. <But then then, you refuse to admit you are a holocaust denier, so what's the difference?> And you don't?
Originally Posted By jonvn "That's correct." So you claim. Yet you have said it so many times, I'm not wondering if there is something to it. "No, it hasn't. If it has, prove me wrong and show me where." And I guess it's easy enough for you, because you just lied again.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh No, I didn't. Again, show me where you answered the question about Richard Branson. Or are you lying again?
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh And you can keep evading the question and pretending you're the victim all you want.
