Originally Posted By tashajilek "Knightly is way too skinny. She needs to eat a sandwich." A sandwhich isnt fatty enough. Maybe a mcribwhich?
Originally Posted By WDW Imagineer to think this started as whether or not hp land will steal business from the mk...
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>to think this started as whether or not hp land will steal business from the mk...<<< Such is the life of a thread on LP. It's a great thing.
Originally Posted By Bob Paris 1 "Seriously, though...It's DISNEYland. It's not "every story that will fit land". That's the only deterrent, to me. I don't see why we have to fit DL/MK with movies that have no original connection to Disney in the first place." EE - have you been to DL and seen Indy? It's AMAZING. Second best attraction in the US after Spidey(Now possibly third since HP opened). It fits into AL perfectly and is THE ULTIMATE Disney attraction for me. How anybody can say it should not be there blows me away. My first visit to DL was in 2001 an dI COULD NOT coming and Indy NOT being there. It's like it ALWAYS has been.
Originally Posted By WDW Imagineer ^not that it shouldn't be there. If you read previous posts, its the fact of walmarting and franchising throughout the disney parks that is bothering us
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>> EE - have you been to DL and seen Indy? It's AMAZING. Second best attraction in the US after Spidey(Now possibly third since HP opened). It fits into AL perfectly and is THE ULTIMATE Disney attraction for me. How anybody can say it should not be there blows me away. My first visit to DL was in 2001 an dI COULD NOT coming and Indy NOT being there. It's like it ALWAYS has been.<<< I have not seen it, and I don't deny that it's a great attraction. It's the ideology behind it that I don't like. Why do we have to pull stories from other creative entities when Disney can make their own? If they want to pull and copy things, at least put those attractions in a "studios" park, and leave the originality to MK/DL, as was originally intended. Otherwise, and as I said, putting "studios" things in MK/DL and visa versa makes for a homogenous experience. ...even if IJA is as great as everyone says. It's just the ideology that bothers me. In a land of Disney stories, it's the outlier.
Originally Posted By Bob Paris 1 "Studios would ruin the IJA. And keep in mind, Studios is my favorite park." Okay you just lost all credibility with me! ; ) MGM was our LEAST favourite Disney theme park when we got to Orlando. IT just felt like a mish mash and didn't know WHAT it wanted to be.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper ^^^I'm okay with people not getting the Studios. It's by far the most fun out of all the parks, and it treats me like an adult, rather than an infant.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>^^^I'm okay with people not getting the Studios. It's by far the most fun out of all the parks, and it treats me like an adult, rather than an infant.<<< Says the person who goes drinking in WS? LOL.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<Says the person who goes drinking in WS?>> Which is why Epcot is either tied for first or second on my list depending on my mood.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>MGM was our LEAST favourite Disney theme park when we got to Orlando. IT just felt like a mish mash and didn't know WHAT it wanted to be.<<< It doesn't. Hollywood is far too a crazy place to make into a theme park. If anything, they should have stuck to the 1930's... (LOVE that part of the park, for the record...One of the best illusions Disney has ever done.)
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>Which is why Epcot is either tied for first or second on my list depending on my mood.<<< I know, just giving you a hard time. ;-) If DAK had more attractions, and more fantasy/MysI/BK, EPCOT would have competition, for my favorite, for the record.
