Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Yep... Also, it needs a Night Show. Other than that...it's perfect. Thematically detailed, immersive, pure Disney.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> i have a really tough time picturing a night show in dak << There's a night show every night in the Everest restrooms. Complete with a Yeti with a broken arm and a team of CMs present to help him wipe.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>Meh, I can do without the night show, personally.<<< OK, Channing. It would be fantastic. They could easily do something that used lights, projections, fountains, even...
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<OK, Channing.>> What does that even mean? <<It would be fantastic. They could easily do something that used lights, projections, fountains, even...>> Sure. It's just not a necessary part of a park for me.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Channing? Nigel Channing? Use your imagination! Not a needed part of the park? Night shows have always been Disney's signature. And thrive never done a bad one. To not have one is pretty much a crime against the parks popularity.... DCA got one in it's big "fix"... Suggesting it was wrong to open without one.
Originally Posted By WDW Imagineer but a night show would mean dak staying open late. What besides everest would be there to do there at night
Originally Posted By Hista98 It's AMAZING. Second best attraction in the US after Spidey(Now possibly third since HP opened). have you ridden HP yet Bob Paris? If not you should wait til you ride it before making that call. Just holding you to the wait til you see it before judging standerd that you impose on everyone else
Originally Posted By Hista98 I think this post should be retitled rabbits, because every time I check it there are like 30 new posts. This is the real Hot Topic.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>> 228 NEW! WDW Imagineer Wed 6/9/2010 8:53p but a night show would mean dak staying open late. What besides everest would be there to do there at night <<<<<< DAK could easily stay open late... It used to. They even had night safaris. And with a new land, show and parade, anything ismpossible.
Originally Posted By Hista98 ya be careful expoct explorer. LOL Bob Paris 1 might ding you on your poor grammer and spelling lol.
Originally Posted By Bob Paris 1 Hista - I don't mean to get down on you but remember that conversation we had about quoting people? It's simple, you just use " " those and highlight the part you are quoting. Otherwise, as your post stands now, you are making two contradictory statements YOURSELF and have attributed nothing to me. It actually makes you like quite ignorant and foolish. Oh and EE, I WILL NOT use the "How do you know you won't like it if you haven't tried it" argument but I will say this. Do you know how ST appears at MGM(I refuse to use the other name)? There is just kinda an Imperial walker and a lame attempt at some ewok village thing there, right? Indy at DL is NOTHING like that but would probably be very different at MGM. At DL it fits PERFECTLY into the foliage, theming, walkway and river of the JC in AL. That was what I meant when I said, "It's like it has always been there". You simply wander off the main path there in AL and suddenly you're in this jungle setting with artifacts and temple architecture around you. It is STUNNING and that is even BEFORE the queue, which is even BEFORE THE RIDE!!!!!! Were Indy put into MGM you might have some faux facade with a giant cardboard cut out of Harrison Ford cracking a whip and maybe, if you were lucky, a jeep parked out the front with the music piped over the intercom. Indeed, were the same effort put into the exterior as was done at DL it would actually seem VERY strange to suddenly come across a very realistic jungle setting with lit torches and ancient statues in the studios - it would be WAYYY out of place! As it is at DL it fits INCREDIBLY and is just THE GREATEST Disney attraction in the US. Despite Hista's snarky comment, I WILL NOT use that card(and came here actually with the intention of NOT using it), but rather will say, as a theme park fan you REALLY owe it to yourself to experience EVERYTHING about this amazing attraction. I think your opinion would be different after that.
Originally Posted By Bob Paris 1 "ya be careful expoct explorer. LOL Bob Paris 1 might ding you on your poor grammer and spelling lol." No - ironically only for stubborn recalcitrants.
Originally Posted By Hista98 I just cut and pasted Bob. I didn't use quotes because you did not use them. Have a Magical day
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Oy...guys don't get catty and snarky... That's what makes people leave websites...and I really love the fact that there has been very little of that here. Bob...I understand perfectly what you are saying. I really do. It fits well...because it is so well done. BUT... when you look at it ideally, and look at it, with JUST the story remaining, it doesn't fit because it's not Disney in the park dedicated to DISNEY storytelling. That's why it's the outlier...for me. See what I'm saying here? Beautiful theming and immersive queue aside, it's like shelving a science book in the history section. It might look like it fits, because if the information given, the type of presentation, but when you look at it closely, it's two different things. With that in mind, it's more in tune with the Studios. And I am sure at if done right (for once) a studio park could pull off a highly themed IJA perfectly. Heck...they already do the 30's theming well.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Oh, and when I finally get over to DL, I can't wait to ride IJA. Just sayin'.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 No way. Scarlett Johansson is the epitomy of hot. And she's got curves. skipper- now here's something we 100% agree on
